Abstract

BackgroundThe use of energy crops and agricultural residues is expected to increase to fulfil the legislative demands of bio-based components in transport fuels. Ensiling methods, adapted from the feed sector, are suitable storage methods to preserve fresh crops throughout the year for, for example, biogas production. Various preservation methods, namely ensiling with and without acid addition for whole crop maize, fibre hemp and faba bean were investigated. For the drier fibre hemp, alkaline urea treatment was studied as well. These treatments were also explored as mild pretreatment methods to improve the disassembly and hydrolysis of these lignocellulosic substrates.ResultsThe investigated storage treatments increased the availability of the substrates for biogas production from hemp and in most cases from whole maize but not from faba bean. Ensiling of hemp, without or with addition of formic acid, increased methane production by more than 50% compared to fresh hemp. Ensiling resulted in substantially increased methane yields also from maize, and the use of formic acid in ensiling of maize further enhanced methane yields by 16%, as compared with fresh maize. Ensiled faba bean, in contrast, yielded somewhat less methane than the fresh material. Acidic additives preserved and even increased the amount of the valuable water-soluble carbohydrates during storage, which affected most significantly the enzymatic hydrolysis yield of maize. However, preservation without additives decreased the enzymatic hydrolysis yield especially in maize, due to its high content of soluble sugars that were already converted to acids during storage. Urea-based preservation significantly increased the enzymatic hydrolysability of hemp. Hemp, preserved with urea, produced the highest carbohydrate increase of 46% in enzymatic hydrolysis as compared to the fresh material. Alkaline pretreatment conditions of hemp improved also the methane yields.ConclusionsThe results of the present work show that ensiling and alkaline preservation of fresh crop materials are useful pretreatment methods for methane production. Improvements in enzymatic hydrolysis were also promising. While all three crops still require a more powerful pretreatment to release the maximum amount of carbohydrates, anaerobic preservation is clearly a suitable storage and pretreatment method prior to production of platform sugars from fresh crops.

Highlights

  • The use of energy crops and agricultural residues is expected to increase to fulfil the legislative demands of bio-based components in transport fuels

  • The hemicellulose and pectin contents were fairly similar in all crops; 16 and 6% ± 0.3% in hemp, 18% and 2% ± 0.1% in maize and 10% and 4% ± 0.1% in faba bean, respectively

  • The dry matter (DM) content of the hemp harvested in October 2009 was a few percent higher than in September 2008, and reached 63% after 2 days wilting prior to the start of storage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of energy crops and agricultural residues is expected to increase to fulfil the legislative demands of bio-based components in transport fuels. Ensiling methods, adapted from the feed sector, are suitable storage methods to preserve fresh crops throughout the year for, for example, biogas production. For the drier fibre hemp, alkaline urea treatment was studied as well These treatments were explored as mild pretreatment methods to improve the disassembly and hydrolysis of these lignocellulosic substrates. The increasing use of energy crops and residues needed as raw materials to fulfil the requirements of bio-based microflora, decrease the pH, preserve the substrate against growth of fungi, bacteria or yeasts, and prevent carbohydrate losses. Requirements to increase the nutritional value of animal feed and to preserve the carbohydrates during the storage have led to increased research on, for example, urea and acidic additives [4,5]. Sulfuric acid treatment prior to anaerobic ensiling was found to enhance the conversion of reed canary grass and switch grass to ethanol [9], indicating that lower levels of acid amendments to ensilage can have the desired effects

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call