Abstract

Abstract. Heavy rains spread over some interval preceding large landslides in sensitive glaciomarine clay in eastern Canada are often noted as a triggering or causative factor in case studies or research reports for individual landslides, although the quantity or duration of the triggering rain event has never been characterized adequately. We selected five large landslide events that occurred in the glaciomarine clay in eastern Canada, and calculated cumulative antecedent precipitation for intervals ranging between one and 365 days preceding each event. We also calculated the antecedent precipitation values for every other day in the record, and computed the relative rank of the landslide day within the complete record. Our results show that several intervals for each landslide event are highly ranked – including those preceding a presumably earthquake-triggered landslide – but overall the rankings were highly variable, ranging between 99% and 6%. The set of highest-ranking intervals are unique for each event, including both short and long-term cumulative precipitation. All of the landslides occurred in the spring months, and the release of sequestered surface and ground water during the spring ground thaw may be related to the timing of the large landslides, so that the evolution of ground frost in the early winter may be of interest for landslide prediction. We found no simple precipitation threshold for triggering large landslides in sensitive glaciomarine clay in eastern Canada, suggesting that some complex temporal and spatial combination of pre-conditions, external energy (e.g. earthquakes), precipitation triggers and other factors such as ground frost formation and thaw are required to trigger a landslide.

Highlights

  • In a comprehensive analysis of landslide types and processes, Cruden and Varnes (1996) cited intense rainfall, rapid snowmelt, and prolonged exceptional precipitation as primary physical factors leading to landslides in general

  • Precipitation at the end of the long winter period (15–30 April) fell as rain. These results show that very heavy winter precipitation, which fell almost entirely as snow and lacked a major winter melt event, may have contributed to the landslide trigger

  • Our study of a large number of antecedent precipitation variables for days with large landslides shows that record-setting intervals are never associated with landslide events, at least for the slides and arbitrary intervals we chose

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a comprehensive analysis of landslide types and processes, Cruden and Varnes (1996) cited intense rainfall, rapid snowmelt, and prolonged exceptional precipitation as primary physical factors leading to landslides in general. Intense rainfall is often considered to be the most important trigger of landslides, followed by rapid snowmelt and water level change. Each of these are thought to destabilize soils by altering porewater pressures and hydraulic gradients within the soil column; those effects are much better documented for shallow landslides on steep slopes or for debris flows than for deep-seated landslides Jakob and Weatherly, 2003; Jakob et al, 2006), and some private companies operate warning or protection systems based on precipitation thresholds (e.g. CP Rail; Bunce, 2008) None of these were developed for application to sensitive clay soils in eastern Canada

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call