Abstract

Previous evaluations of plan implementation focused on whether the materiality construction was in accordance with the plan. Without proper data, it is difficult to confirm whether the planning goals have been achieved. In this study, two types of big data have been used—full sample built-environment data and mobile-positioning big data—to evaluate the results of the implementation of the polycentric system in master planning in the Hangzhou core built-up area. Using the full sample built-environment data, the evaluation of materiality construction will be more objective and accurate. Using the mobile-positioning big data, the evaluation of the planning goals can be realized; this was almost impossible in the past. However, two aspects are considered: whether daily public activities, such as employment and recreation, have been dispersed from the old city and subsequently re-gathered in multiple centers outside the old city, and whether the polycentric system aids in optimizing the spatial relationship between residence and public activity. The following conclusions were drawn. In terms of actual materiality construction, the results showed minimal discrepancy from the plan. Fifteen city-level public centers have been constructed at principal, secondary, and sub-secondary levels. However, the polycentric system failed to achieve the expected effects of the planning goals. First, the public centers contributed in the gathering of public activities; however, the level of gathering at the newly built-up public centers was considerably lower than that at traditional public centers. Second, the public centers failed to encourage people to visit the nearest blocks for daily public activities, mainly because of the path dependence on the traditional centers in the process of multi-centralization and over-rapid expansion of the city. Owing to this, residents did not have sufficient time to adjust to the spatial relationship between the residence and daily public activities.

Highlights

  • The emergence of polycentric systems is an irresistible trend of the urban growth and service industry spillover caused by the excessive agglomeration of elements in an original center, which can theoretically moderate the problem of agglomeration diseconomy caused by a single center [1,2]

  • The result that planners want to obtain the most is that both materiality construction conformance and goal conformance are high; this rarely occurs in reality

  • Its opposite situation is that both materiality construction conformance and goal conformance are low, indicating that plan implementation is almost a complete failure, which is the least desired result

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The emergence of polycentric systems is an irresistible trend of the urban growth and service industry spillover caused by the excessive agglomeration of elements in an original center, which can theoretically moderate the problem of agglomeration diseconomy caused by a single center [1,2]. A polycentric system has two objectives: firstly, it aims to alleviate the excessive concentration of daily public activities in old cities by dispersing and re-gathering them in multiple peripheral centers; secondly, it aims to optimize the spatial relationship between residence and daily public activities, providing daily public services for residents living outside the old city, reducing the length of the travel distance. If public activities were dispersed and re-gathered but residents of peripheral areas would still need to travel to the old city for their daily activities and residents of the old city to peripheral centers, the polycentric system would contradict its original planning objective. It is necessary to evaluate the implementation of the polycentric system in a timely fashion to identify problems and make timely adjustments in relevant policies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call