Abstract
Methylprednisolone is commonly used to attenuate the cytokine storm and prevent mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia. However, the optimal methylprednisolone dose and duration are unclear. Additional data are required on the effectiveness of methylprednisolone in reducing mortality in COVID-19. This real-life retrospective study aimed to analyze the data of a COVID-19 dedicated ICU and compare the mortality rates of standard care, low-dose, and pulse-dose methylprednisolone in patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support. Methylprednisolone's indication, dose, and duration were determined according to the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia based on the patient's demographic parameters, comorbidities, laboratory data, radiology, and arterial blood gas analysis results. 867 patients were grouped as: no methylprednisolone (standard care), low-dose (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) methylprednisolone or pulse-dose (250-1,000 mg/day) methylprednisolone. The overall mortality rate was 63.78%. Adjusting the dose of methylprednisolone according to the severity of the disease resulted in statistically similar mortality rates despite the increase in disease severity. Mortality was 62.71% in standard treatment, 65.76% in low-dose, and 62.10% in pulse-dose methylprednisolone groups (p = 0.633). Invasive mechanical ventilation at admission was associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.826 [95% CI: 1.542-2.161]; p < 0.001). Hematologic disorders and malignancies, arterial blood pH and HCO3, neutrophil count, and NLR at admission were also associated with mortality. Personalizing the dose and duration of methylprednisolone according to the patient's disease severity assessed with demographic, clinical, and laboratory results may benefit mortality in severe COVID-19 patients receiving ventilatory support in the ICU. Hematologic disorders and malignancies, arterial blood pH and HCO3, neutrophil count, and NLR at admission were associated with mortality in our patient cohort.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: European review for medical and pharmacological sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.