Evaluation of Patient-Specific Quality Control (QC) for Markerless Dynamic Tumor Tracking (MDTT) Deliveries

Abstract

To report on the patient-specific QC for MDTT for liver and lung tumors treated using the dome-of-liver/diaphragm as a surrogate for the target position and compare to the QC of conventional fiducial-based tracking. Vero4DRT is a linear accelerator that has a gimbal-mounted waveguide and collimation system allowing the radiation beam to perform dynamic tumor tracking based on a patient's respiratory motion. A correlation model is built between an external IR marker placed on the chest and an internal structure, which may be implanted fiducial surrogates or in the case of MDTT, an anatomic landmark. During treatment an orthogonal kV image pair is taken every second. The auto detected internal structure position versus the predicted position is recorded in treatment log files. Five IMRT tracking plans were delivered to two commercial motion phantoms with in-house additions for patient-specific tracking QC. For point dose measurements, a 0.6cc farmer chamber was placed inside the dynamic tracking phantom which contains fiducials for fiducial-based tracking delivery and an anatomic landmark for MDTT. For 2D dose distribution measurements, a radiographic film insert for the Quasar Respiratory Motion Phantom was constructed. The phantom contains both fiducials and has a liver-dome shape at one end to facilitate MDTT. Both motion platforms were interfaced with software that enabled patient-specific respiratory motion traces acquired during a 4DCT scan. Each plan was delivered three times on each phantom: 1) in static mode, 2) during fiducial-based tracking, and 3) during MDTT. Chamber measurements taken during static and tracked delivery were compared to the average chamber dose from the treatment planning software (TPS). Film distributions measured during tracked deliveries were compared to the static film distribution using gamma analysis with FILMQA PRO software. Finally, dynamic tracking treatment statistics, extracted from log files, were compared between fiducial and markerless tracking deliveries. All chamber measurements resulted in dose differences <2.5% compared with the TPS. Dose differences between fiducial-based and MDTT were 0.26% on average (range 0.03-0.62%). For film dose map analysis, gamma pass rates were >95% for all plans for all tracking methods. The average gamma pass rate for 3%/3mm was 99.4% (fiducial-based) vs 98.4% (markerless). For 2%/2mm, the average gamma pass rate was 96.4% (fiducial-based tracking) vs 95.6% (MDTT). Dynamic treatment statistics from logs files reported an average 3D absolute deviation from predicted position of 0.52mm (±0.24) for fiducial tracking and 1.19mm (±0.50) for MDTT. Both fiducial-based and MDTT plans meet passing criteria for patient-specific QC. 3D absolute deviation of detected versus predicted position are larger for MDTT compared to fiducial tracking, however no significant impact on dose delivery was measured.