Abstract
Abstract The performance of paraffin inhibitors from several chemical families was evaluated using two model waxy oils in bench-top tests such as cloud point and pour point, and in small-scale deposition rigs using a cold finger and a flow loop. In addition, rheological characterization of the inhibited systems was conducted to provide additional insights into the function of the paraffin inhibitors. Similarities and differences in the response of the model oils to the paraffin inhibitors are discussed along with the correlations between the results from bench-top tests and the observed wax deposit inhibition performance. The model waxy-oils were formulated using blends of commercially available waxes dissolved in a paraffinic solvent or a mixture of paraffinic and aromatic solvents. The wax blends were chosen to represent a broad range of carbon number distributions including one highly polydisperse distribution with an extended distribution of high carbon number waxes exceeding C50. Candidate paraffin inhibitors were initially evaluated for their impact on cloud point and pour point in these model oils. Subsequent testing of the inhibited systems included rheological characterization over a range of temperatures, cold finger deposition tests and flow loop deposition tests in a pipe-in-pipe geometry. All results are compared to the baseline results for the uninhibited model waxy oils. While changes in cloud point and pour point gave a good indication that a particular paraffin inhibitor was impacting the wax crystallization process, this did not guarantee a significant reduction in deposits of the inhibited system. Moreover, the experimental conditions used in the small-scale deposition tests also affected the observed performance of paraffin inhibitors, indicating that temperature gradients (i.e., oil temperature and coolant temperature) must be optimized to achieve the highest discriminating power. This study highlights the degree of correlation and the areas of departure between bench-top test results and the main objectives of deposit reduction, and yield stress reduction in flowing systems. It also discusses the advantages and risks of using only the bench-top test results for the selection of paraffin inhibitors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.