Abstract

AbstractIncreased frequency and occurrence of herbicide-resistant biotypes heightens the need for alternative wild oat management strategies. This study aimed to exploit the height differential between wild oat and crops by targeting wild oat between panicle emergence and seed shed timing. Two field studies were conducted either in Lacombe, AB, or Lacombe, AB and Saskatoon, SK, from 2015 to 2017. In the first study, we compared panicle removal methods: hand clipping, use of a hedge trimmer, and a selective herbicide crop topping application to a weedy check and an industry standard in-crop herbicide application in wheat. These treatments were tested early (at panicle emergence), late (at initiation of seed shed), or in combination at one location over 3 yr. In the second study, we investigated optimal timing of panicle removal via a hedge trimmer with weekly removals in comparison to a weedy check in wheat and lentil. This study was conducted at two locations, Lacombe, AB, and Saskatoon, SK, over 3 yr. Among all the tested methods, the early crop topping treatment consistently had the largest impact on wild oat density, dockage, seedbank, and subsequent year crop yield. The early (at panicle emergence) or combination of early and late (at initiation of seed shed) treatments tended to reduce wild oat populations the following season the most compared to the late treatments. Subsequent wild oat populations were not influenced by panicle removal timing, but only by crop and location interactions. Panicle removal timing did significantly affect wild oat dockage in the year of treatment, but no consistent optimal timing could be identified. However, the two studies together highlight additional questions to be investigated, as well as the opportunity to manage wild oat seedbank inputs at the panicle emergence stage of the wild oat lifecycle.

Highlights

  • Wild oat has been a longstanding global problem weed due to its competitiveness and dormant nature

  • On the Canadian Prairies, herbicide resistance frequency has increased to the extent that 69% of wild oat populations collected from fields prior to harvest are herbicide resistant (Beckie et al 2020)

  • Because of this, increased variability of weed control is often observed with these products, and effective weed control may be limited to areas with more suitable soil characteristics such

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wild oat has been a longstanding global problem weed due to its competitiveness and dormant nature. The first objective was to compare three methods of targeting wild oat panicles: hand-clipping (to completely remove panicles above the crop canopy), cutter bar (to simulate how a producer could physically remove panicles in a field, and a similar efficacy), and selective herbicide application (to investigate the impact of selective crop topping at panicle emergence timing on seed production and viability).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call