Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of different local anaesthetic techniques in pain, disruptive behaviour and anxiety in children´s dental treatment.Material and methods: This was a randomised and parallel clinical trial. The sample consisted of 105 children (5–8 years old) that were divided into three groups (n = 35) according to the anaesthetic technique: conventional anaesthesia (CA); vibrational anaesthesia (VBA); computer-controlled local anaesthesia delivery (CCLAD). The outcomes were self-perception of pain (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale – WBF; Numerical Rating Scale – NRS); disruptive behaviour (Face, Legg, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale – FLACC); anxiety (Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale; modified Venham Picture test – VPTm) and physiological parameters (blood pressure – systolic – SBP and diastolic – DBP; heart rate – HR; oxygen saturation – SpO2; respiratory rate – RR). Data were statistically analysed with Kruskall-Wallis test and ANOVA for repeated measures with Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).Results: All the patients exhibited the same level of dental anxiety at baseline (Corah’s Dental Anxiety Scale). There was no difference in self-perception pain, irrespective the evaluation tool used (WBF – p = .864; VAS – p = .761). No differences were detected in disruptive behaviour (FLACC – p = .318); anxiety (VPTm – p = .274); blood pressure (SBP – p = .239; DBP – p = .512); heart rate (p = .728); oxygen saturation (p = .348) and respiratory rate (p = .238) between anaesthetic techniques.Conclusion: Different anaesthetic dental local techniques do not affect the levels of pain, disruptive behaviour, anxiety and physiological parameters in children aged 5–8 years old.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call