Evaluation of Oxygen Reduction System (ORS) in Large-scale Fire Tests

Abstract

An oxygen reduction system (ORS) is a fire prevention system that uses a low-oxygen environment to reduce, if not eliminate, the potential for ignition and fire propagation in a protected space. The key parameter for ORS design is the limiting oxygen concentration (LOC), defined as the lowest O2 concentration that can support combustion for a given fuel. The present work examines LOCs of solid fuels at large scale in a configuration representative of a rack-storage and discusses the results in relation to the design concentration for ORS.To simulate ORS applications in engineering practice, a two-tier fuel array of standard commodities in rack storage configuration was set up in an enclosure. A constant N2/Air mixture flow was supplied to the enclosure at a desired oxygen concentration. The oxygen concentration was varied from 9% up to 17%. A premixed flame with a constant heat release rate was used as the ignition source to maintain repeatable test conditions. This premixed flame ignitor represents potential heat sources such as electric arc and hot work that are not sensitive to oxygen level. The tested materials included five standard commodities: Class 3, Cartoned Unexpanded Plastic (CUP), Cartoned Expanded Plastic (CEP), Uncartoned Unexpanded Plastic (UUP) and Uncartoned Expanded Plastic (UEP). This paper reports detailed test results at different oxygen levels only for Class 3. The impact of the test conditions on fire propagation was examined and the results showed that the oxygen concentration was the major parameter to control fire propagation. When successful flame spread is initiated by the igniter, the fire size tends to be larger as the igniter is sustained for a longer time. The results of fire propagation success were obtained for the five standard commodities under different oxygen concentrations with a sustained igniter (hard limits) and without a sustained igniter (soft limits). The LOC was defined as an oxygen concentration at 0.05 probability of flame spread by using statistical analysis. The resulting LOC values measured for different commodities in a two-tier rack storage are:• Cartoned (Class 3, CUP and CEP) – hard limit 11.1%,• Uncartoned (UUP and UEP) – hard limit 13.0%,• Cartoned (Class 3, CUP and CEP) – soft limit 13.8%,• Uncartoned (UUP and UEP) – soft limit 14.7%.These LOCs are generally lower than the oxygen design concentrations recommended by existing standards including VdS 3527 and EN 16750 due to different test conditions. The hard limits resemble fundamental LOC for gases and vapors and do not depend significantly on the ignition duration and array size, while the soft limits vary significantly with the size and configuration of the fuel array and ignition duration. It is concluded that the hard limits are more suitable for ORS design purposes.