Abstract

Abstract Several approaches are usually applied for modelling the source of high pressure under-expanded jets, ranging from the computationally expensive resolution of the jet's shock structure to simple formulae (pseudo-source or notional nozzle approaches). However, the assumptions made in each approach introduce inaccuracies in the CFD calculations. The objective of this work was twofold; to compare and evaluate the performance of both selected notional nozzle approaches and turbulence models with experimental results of free-shear high momentum H 2 round jets. The experimental data covered horizontal H 2 releases issuing from small nozzles (0.25–1 mm diameter). Three two-equation turbulence models were chosen for the simulations, the popular standard k- e , the Shear Stress Transport (SST) and the baseline (BSL) k- ω model together with five notional nozzle approaches. The numerical results were presented in a systematic way in order to make general conclusions on the performance of both the approaches and models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.