Abstract
Near-field earthquake is one of the primary sources of ground motions that significantly affecting the structure's seismic response in its surrounding area containing pulse-long periods. The two popular and reliable approaches for the seismic investigation of structures are known as the force and displacement-based seismic design (FBD and DBD), extensively developed in the literature. In the present study, three types of steel buildings were defined for the seismic analysis, including five, eight, and fifteen-story steel buildings as the representatives of the multi-story, middle-rise, and small high-rise buildings, respectively. Steel structure designs and nonlinear analysis were done by implementing SAP2000 and Opensees software, respectively. The designed buildings were analyzed statistically and dynamically by performing the criteria determined in the FEMA-P750, Standard Code 2800, FEMA 356, and FEMA-P695, and then, FBD and DBD results were compared. The nonlinear static analysis results showed the acceptable displacements corresponding to the displacement criteria suggested by FEMA 356, showing the desirable performance of the designed structures. Also, the dynamic analysis results confirmed the reliability of the FEMA 356′s design criteria for the five and 8-story steel structures. However, the small high-rise building design has not met the regulations suggested by FEMA 356.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.