Evaluation of multiple gridded snowfall datasets using gauge observations over high mountain Asia

Abstract

Snowfall is an important component of the High Mountain Asia (HMA) cryosphere; its changes affect the regional energy and water balance. Snowfall data from numerous gridded products provide the basis for conducting climate-change studies; however, the applicability of these datasets in HMA has not been assessed comprehensively in terms of precipitation. This study comprehensively evaluates the applicability of the following widely used gridded datasets in HMA for the period 1991–2014: fifth generation of European ReAnalysis (ERA5), Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), High Asia Refined analysis (HAR), Multi-Source Weather (MSWX), National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD). The accuracy features of each dataset were evaluated based on observations from 148 gauges at various temporal scales (i.e., annual, monthly, and daily), elevations, sub-regions, and snowfall intensities. The results show that CMFD performs better at multiple temporal scales (i.e., annual, cool season, monthly, and daily) than other snowfall data. In addition, the CMFD accuracy has good stability, even at different elevations. CMFD is advantageous regarding interpreting the frequency and amount of different levels of (even extreme) snowfall events. The slightly inferior MSWX also performs well at different timescales, spatial scales, and elevations, and constitutes an attractive alternative to CMFD. HAR captures better light and moderate snowfall, and is the most accurate of the three sets of gridded products that contain direct snowfall data. This study constitutes an important reference for selecting suitable snowfall datasets for future scientific research.