Abstract
Monolithic and core-shell columns were comparatively evaluated for separation of deisopropylatrazine (DIA), deethylatrazine (DEA), hydroxyatrazine (HAT), simazine (SIM) and atrazine (ATR) under similar conditions of elution, flow rate and sample volume. Although both columns provided separation of the analytes with resolution > 1.5, the core-shell column exhibited better efficiency, leading to narrower peaks. It has height equivalent to the theoretical plates (HETP) for DEA, DIA and HAT, eluted under isocratic elution, about 2.5 times smaller than those of the monolithic column. A soil sample was studied by ultrasound assisted extraction with 80:20 (v/v) acetonitrile:water, revealing the presence of HAT and ATR. This sample was enriched with 0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 mg kg-1 of the five triazine compounds and analyzed, leading to recovery percentages between 45 and 86%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
