Abstract

We compared two approaches (denoted as Virkkula” and “Drinovec” equations) for the determination of black carbon via attenuation measurements with a transmissometer OT-21 (Magee Scientific) on quartz fiber filters from different station types (urban-traffic, rural-background and remote) within the Austrian air monitoring network. First, we evaluated the entire data set to compare the performance of the models in the determination of the loading parameter k and the mass attenuation cross section σ. Then we investigate k and σ for different station types. The data set comprises 299 filters, all representative for 24 h samples collected with High-Volume-Samplers. Mass concentrations ranged from approximately 5-100 μg m−3 and covered all seasons.Both approaches give statistically indistinguishable results of k with values of 1.00*10−3 ( ±2*10−4) and 0.97*10−3 ( ±1*10−4), respectively, if the entire data set is evaluated. The “Drinovec” approach gives slightly lower values for σ than “Virkkula” with values of 32.1 m2 g−1 ( ±1.1 m2 g−1) and 35.3 m2 g−1 ( ±1.9 m2 g−1). If the data set is restricted to ATN<300 only, no statistically relevant changes are obtained for k and σ using the “Virkkula” equation. Applying the “Drinovec” equation both parameters, k and σ increase when the data set is restricted.The investigation of the different station types yields values of k statistically not different from zero, whereas σ values are different for the respective station types. Highest values of σ = 33.7 m2 g−1 ( ±1.4 m2 g−1) were observed for the remote, followed by σ = 31.8 m2 g−1 ( ±0.5 m2 g−1) for the rural-background station and lowest values of σ = 24.4 m2 g−1 ( ±0.5 m2 g−1) for the urban-traffic stations, possibly reflecting the respective aerosol type.Based on the results for k and σ using either overall values or station type specific values we performed an extensive validation, discussing the application of the transmissometer measurements for a quick, easy and non-destructive quantification of eBC on either fresh sampled or archived filters of different station types. Applying the method for stations not classified as urban, rural or remote a deviation of eBC and EC values up to 23% can be expected. If the station type is known and the respective k and σ values are used this deviation goes down to 10% or lower. This would allow users to obtain long-term time-series going back to times when no on-line instruments were existing, and to obtain these data sets for sites where no on-line instruments are installed even now.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call