Abstract

Received May 17, 2012 Revised July 25, 2012 Accepted August 13, 2012 Address for correspondence Han-Sin Jeong, MD, PhD Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea Tel +82-2-3410-3579 Fax +82-2-3410-6987 E-mail hansin.jeong@gmail.com Background and ObjectivesZZTo determine the diagnostic clues to differentiate tuberculous lymph node infection from nodal metastasis in patients with both papillary thyroid carcinoma and cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Subjects and MethodZZWe retrospectively reviewed 11 patients suffering concurrently from papillary thyroid carcinomas with cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Nine of the 11 patients underwent preoperative neck ultrasonography (US) and seven CT scans. Using the surgical pathology as the reference standards, the results of the preoperative diagnostic tools were re-evaluated according to lymph node level-based analysis. US and CT features were also compared between metastatic nodes and tuberculous lymphadenitis. ResultsZZPreoperative CT could localize the involved lymph node levels and differentiate tuberculous infection from metastasis of thyroid carcinoma in only two of seven patients. The site of the involved lymph nodes, the presence of pulmonary tuberculosis, and the tumor volume of the thyroid carcinoma were the clues to diagnose the lymph node status. However, in five of seven cases, CT could not differentiate tuberculosis from metastasis in the lymph nodes. The morphological characteristics of lymph nodes seen on CT and US did not differ between tuberculous infection and metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinomas. ConclusionZZPre-operative CT or US does not provide differential information about lymph node status between tuberculous infection and metastasis in patients with concurrent papillary thyroid carcinomas and cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. Rather, clinical characteristics such as the site of the involved lymph nodes, the primary tumor burden, and the associated clinical features can help the physician differentiate between them. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2012;55:571-7

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.