Abstract

BackgroundOutdoor malaria transmission is becoming an increasingly important problem in malaria control in Africa. Larval control is a promising intervention as it can target both indoor and outdoor biting mosquitoes. However, the currently available biolarvicide formulations have a short effective duration, and consequently larval control incurs a high operational expense due to the requirement for frequent re-treatment of larval habitats. Formulations of biolarvicides with long-lasting effects is highly desired. A recently developed FourStar® slow-release briquet formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus was evaluated to test its efficacy on malaria vectors.MethodsThe study evaluated FourStar™ briquets 180-days formulation under semi-natural and natural conditions to test their efficacy in reducing the mosquito population in western Kenya. The semi-natural habitats used the formulation dissolved in rainwater with appropriate concentrations, and second-instar larvae of Anopheles gambiae were introduced and the number of surviving larvae and pupae produced was recorded daily as the outcome. The briquets formulation was then tested in natural habitats for efficacy on pupal productivity reduction in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya. The formulation was finally tested for efficacy in reducing adult mosquito populations in randomized clusters in western Kenya highland.ResultsIn semi-natural conditions, the FourStar™ briquets 180-days formulation completely inhibited mosquito pupal production in the first 3 months, and then reduced pupal productivity by 87–98% (P < 0.001) 4–6 months after application. In natural habitats, during the first 2 months no pupae were detected from any of the treated habitats in highland sites, and Anopheles spp. pupal density was reduced by 60–90% in the next 3–5 months (P < 0.001). In the lowland site, pupal productivity reduction was 100% in the first 3 months, and 75–90% in the next 4–5 months (P < 0.001). The randomized cluster trial found that the application of the briquets formulation reduced mean densities of indoor-biting mosquitoes by 76–82% (P < 0.001) and by 67–75% (P < 0.001) for outdoor-biting mosquitoes.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that long-lasting biological larviciding was effective in reducing pupal productivity of larval habitats, and reducing indoor and outdoor resting mosquitoes. The study suggests that long-lasting microbial larviciding may be a promising complementary malaria vector control tool and warrants further large-scale evaluation.

Highlights

  • Outdoor malaria transmission is becoming an increasingly important problem in malaria control in Africa

  • Larval source management (LSM) offers the dual benefits of reducing numbers of outdoor- and indoor-biting mosquitoes [13] and, may be valuable in tackling prevalent residual malaria transmission that is a major challenge in malaria control in Africa

  • The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a slow-release microbial larvicide based on Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus in reducing habitat productivity and adult malaria vector abundance in Kenya

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outdoor malaria transmission is becoming an increasingly important problem in malaria control in Africa. Methods: The study evaluated FourStarTM briquets 180-days formulation under semi-natural and natural condi‐ tions to test their efficacy in reducing the mosquito population in western Kenya. The briquets formulation was tested in natural habitats for efficacy on pupal productivity reduction in highland and lowland sites in western Kenya. The formulation was tested for efficacy in reducing adult mosquito populations in randomized clusters in western Kenya highland. LSM offers the dual benefits of reducing numbers of outdoor- and indoor-biting mosquitoes [13] and, may be valuable in tackling prevalent residual malaria transmission that is a major challenge in malaria control in Africa. One important question to be addressed is whether LSM is feasible and cost effective in parts of rural Africa where larval habitats are more extensive and malaria transmission intensity is high

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call