Abstract

Conservation and management of culturally and economically important species rely on monitoring programs to provide accurate and robust estimates of population size. Rotary screw traps (RSTs) are often used to monitor populations of anadromous fish, including fall-run Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California’s Central Valley. Abundance estimates from RST data depend on estimating a trap's efficiency via mark-recapture releases. Because efficiency estimates are highly variable and influenced by many factors, abundance estimates can be highly uncertain. An additional complication is the multiple accepted methods for how to apply a limited number of trap efficiency estimates, each from discrete time-periods, to a population’s downstream migration, which can span months. Yet, few studies have evaluated these different methods, particularly with long-term monitoring programs. We used 21 years of mark-recapture data and RST catch of juvenile fall-run Chinook Salmon on the Stanislaus River, California, to investigate factors associated with trap efficiency variability across years and mark-recapture releases. We compared annual abundance estimates across five methods that differed in treatment of trap efficiency (stratified versus modeled) and statistical approach (frequentist versus Bayesian) to assess the variability of estimates across methods, and to evaluate whether method affected trends in estimated abundance. Consistent with short-term studies, we observed negative associations between estimated trap efficiency and river discharge as well as fish size. Abundance estimates were robust across all methods, frequently having overlapping confidence intervals. Abundance trends, for the number of increases and decreases from year to year, did not differ across methods. Estimated juvenile abundances were significantly related to adult escapement counts, and the relationship did not depend on estimation method. Understanding the sources of uncertainty related to abundance estimates is necessary to ensure that high-quality estimates are used in life cycle and stock-recruitment modeling.

Highlights

  • Conservation and management of anadromous fish species is challenged by their complex migratory life history (Merz et al 2013)

  • We reviewed 21 years of markrecapture release and rotary screw traps (RSTs) catch data from the Stanislaus River fall-run Chinook Salmon monitoring program to identify factors associated with trap efficiency estimates and to evaluate the program’s current analysis methods for estimating juvenile abundance

  • We identified some factors associated with variation among trap efficiency estimates, there was still unexplained variation that we were concerned could be propagating into abundance estimates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conservation and management of anadromous fish species is challenged by their complex migratory life history (Merz et al 2013). Rotary screw traps are a tool often used to monitor juvenile anadromous fish species and assess the effects of management strategies. In regulated rivers, estimating abundance of downstream migrants is especially useful for monitoring the effects of river management (e.g., diversion or discharge regulation; Sykes et al 2009) and watershed restoration programs (Merz et al 2013). Fisheries stock abundance estimates of anadromous species can be estimated from rotary screw traps (RSTs) using straightforward mark-recapture methods. A sample of fish is marked and released upstream of the trap (reviewed by Volkhardt et al 2007), and the proportion of marked fish recaptured after the release ( called trap efficiency or capture probability) is used to expand the number of unmarked fish captured in the RST to an abundance of fish that pass the trap

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call