Evaluation of left atrial function and tissue after pulmonary vein isolation - initial results of The EVALUATE-PVI STUDY

Abstract

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, the direct and long-term impact of ablation injury on left atrial (LA) function and tissue is poorly understood. Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the acute and long-term impact of radiofrequency (RF) PVI ablation on LA function and corresponding tissue changes as assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Methods Seventeen patients (76.5% male, 60.8±9.7 years) with AF who underwent primo RF PVI as part of the EVALUATE-PVI STUDY underwent three sequential CMR scans prior to PVI, and <72 hours and 3 months after PVI ablation. T2-weighted turbo spin echo imaging was applied to assess post-ablation edema. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) images were acquired to study acute LA wall injury and chronic fibrosis formation. LA volume and function were derived from two-chamber and four-chamber SSFP cine images. Maximum and minimal LA volume was indexed to body surface area to compute LAVimax and LAVimin. Longitudinal LA strain was calculated using feature tracking, and subdivided into reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain. Results Acutely post-PVI, T2w images showed increased signal intensity and thickening throughout the entire LA wall. LGE images showed diffuse increased signal intensity, without distinct focal high signal intensity areas (Fig. 1). Functional assessment at this stage showed significantly reduced LA emptying fraction (EF), LA reservoir, and contractile strain compared to pre-PVI (54.8±11.1% vs. 48.5±7.9%, p=0.01; 18.6±5.6% vs. 14.6±2.0%, p<0.01; 8.5±3.5% vs. 5.2±1.8%, p<0.001, respectively), while LA conduit strain, LAVimin, and LAVimax did not differ significantly (Fig. 2). The LGE images acquired at 3 months, displayed clear, focal, high signal intensity areas surrounding the PVs. At this stage post-PVI, a significant increase in LA strain was observed (LA reservoir strain 14.6±2.0% vs. 16.9±3.5%, p<0.01; and contractile strain 5.2±1.8% vs. 6.7±2.9%, p<0.01; respectively). LAVimax was significantly reduced at 3 months compared to acutely post-PVI (Fig. 2). LAVimin and LA conduit strain did not differ between the pre- and post-PVI stages. Conclusion PVI ablation resulted in temporary reduced LA function acutely post-PVI, likely due to edema and thickening of the LA wall. At three months, LGE images revealed clearly visible increased signal intensity in the ablated segments. At this stage, LA function improved, though full recovery did not occur as evidenced by the persistent slightly reduced contractile strain, possibly due to the ablation-induced loss of LA myocardium and formation of fibrosis. The decrease in LAVimax indicates reverse remodeling as a result of the ablation.