Abstract
Tuberculosis genotypic clustering is used as a proxy for recent transmission. The association between clustering and recent transmission becomes problematic when the genotyping method lacks specificity in defining a cluster, as well as for clusters with extensive jurisdictional histories and/or common genotypes.We investigated the four largest spoligotype/12 loci MIRU-VNTR-defined clusters in Harris County, Texas from 2006–2012 to determine their historical contribution to tuberculosis morbidity, estimate the contributions from recent and remote transmission, and determine the impact of secondary genotyping on cluster definition. The clusters contained 189, 64, 51 and 38 cases. Each cluster was linked to cluster(s) previously identified by Houston Tuberculosis Initiative; 3 since 1995 and the fourth in 2002. Among cases for which timing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission relative to tuberculosis disease could be ascertained, nearly equal proportions were associated with recent and remote transmission. The extent to which genotyping with an additional 12 MIRU-VNTR loci modified the cluster definition varied from little or no impact for the two smaller clusters to moderate impact for the larger clusters.Tuberculosis control measures to reduce morbidity associated with large clusters must involve strategies to identify and treat individuals who recently acquired infection, as well as persons infected for years.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
