Abstract

The introduction of interfacial area transport equation (IATE) has greatly improved the overall performance of two-fluid model due to the fact that the IATE can predict the interfacial area concentration (IAC) more accurately. However, models in the source and sink terms of IATE that are developed for predicting bubble coalescence and breakup are mainly based on small diameter pipe flows. Since the two-phase flow in a large diameter pipe is characterized by its multi-dimensional nature, the IATE should be confirmed before being applied to large pipe flows. From this point of view, local measurements in air–water bubbly flow systems in a large pipe with 101.6mm diameter were performed by using four-sensor optical probes. The radial profiles of the void fraction, IAC, bubble Sauter mean diameter and interfacial velocity were obtained at two axial locations of z/D=2 and 29. The simplified one-dimensional, steady-state, adiabatic one-group IATE with eight sets of bubble coalescence and breakup models was evaluated against the present experimental data and that from the literatures. The evaluation results showed that the Sun et al. (2004a) model is the best one for large diameter pipes. This model can well reflect the interfacial transfer mechanisms and can provide a reasonable prediction in general. Besides, the models of Smith et al. (2012a) and Ishii and Kim (2001) are also recommended due to their relative good performance in the prediction of IAC. Further work should be undertaken to develop a new bubble coalescence and breakup model with extra consideration of the multi-dimensional flow behavior in large pipes, if necessary.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call