Evaluation of immunoelectron microscopic techniques in the study of basement membrane antigens.

Abstract

Recent technical advances in immunoelectron microscopy (IEM), including methods of pre- and postembedding IEM and cryoultramicrotomy, have helped to elucidate the precise ultrastructural localization of various basement membrane-related molecules. Our objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of several different techniques for studying the ultrastructural organization of basement membrane components. We found that, while "on-surface" immunolabeling of postembedding IEM and cryoultramicrotomy with anti-type IV collagen or anti-laminin-5 antibody clearly demonstrated dense labeling on the lamina densa, preembedding IEM with a 1-nm ultra-small gold probe showed labeling only on the epidermal and/or dermal surfaces of the lamina densa, with no specific gold particles being seen within the lamina densa itself. These results indicate that even ultra-small colloidal gold-labeled antibody fails to penetrate the lamina densa in preembedding IEM. However, labeling with a GB3 monoclonal antibody against laminin-5 was demonstrable with preembedding IEM and cryoultramicrotomy, but not with postembedding IEM, probably due to a loss of antigenicity. These results confirm the advantages and limitations of these techniques of IEM and emphasize the importance of using different techniques of IEM in determining the precise ultrastructural distribution of basement membrane antigens.