Evaluation of Hindfoot Alignment on Lateral Weightbearing x-rays: A Novel Prospective In Vivo Study

Abstract

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: In clinical practice and research, there are several scenarios when a hindfoot alignment view weightbearing XR is not obtained whether as a result of a lack of resources, technology, in retrospective studies when a hindfoot view was not obtained, as well as in many practices where a hindfoot view XR is not considered a routine examination for foot and ankle disorders. A lateral weightbearing radiograph however is almost routinely obtained, and the goal of this study was to correlate the hindfoot alignment angle with measurements on lateral weightbearing images. Methods: Four volunteers (8 feet) with flexible feet and ankles and no symptoms, nor significant trauma & surgical history in their lower limbs were recruited for this study. A portable fluoroscopy machine (Smart C, Turner Imaging, Salt Lake City, USA) was used for imaging. The participant was asked to stand on different custom wooden wedges with the angle changed every 5 degrees from 30 degrees of varus to 30 degrees of valgus and a weightbearing lateral image was taken for each position. The hindfoot alignment was measured using a skin marker which had been drawn prior to initiation of the imaging, and the angular changes of the hindfoot was measured with the placement of each wedge placed. All standardized measurements of the midfoot and hindfoot were obtained on the lateral images. Results: With the hindfoot positional changes between 30o of varus to 30o of valgus, there was a gradual measurable change in the subtalar joint, with corresponding changes in the midfoot and hindfoot. There was a significant linear correlation between the hindfoot alignment angle and all radiographic parameters on lateral images. When the hindfoot alignment angle increased by 1 degree in the valgus direction, there was 0.49o decrease in the pitch angle, 0.58o of decrease in the middle vs posterior facet angle, 0.06o of decrease in the proximal cuneiform/cuboid height, 0.40o of decrease in the proximal cuneiform/5th Metatarsal height, 0.40o of increase in the fifth metatarsal/cuboid height, 0.009o of increase in the sinus tarsi/lateral process height, and 0.015o increase in Cuboid/Anterior Process Height. (Figure 1) Conclusion: The lateral weightbearing XR can be used to predict the status of the hindfoot alignment, and this study has proven that this can be none not only qualitatively but also quantitatively. This novel research can provide our colleagues with linear regression equations to correlate the lateral imaging metrics with the hindfoot alignment angle. Further study with a larger sample size and participants with different types of hindfoot deformities is needed to help develop an algorithm that would help both clinical practice and research.