Evaluation of Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery Using a Crowdsourced Patient Survey.

Abstract

Amazon's Mechanical Turk was used to distribute a survey. The Chew's Brief Health Literacy Screener was used to evaluate the level of HL. The cohort was divided into two groups: non-PRS and PRS groups. Four subgroups were created: cosmetic, noncosmetic, reconstructive, and nonreconstructive groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess associations between levels of HL and sociodemographic characteristics. A total of 510 responses were analyzed in this study. Of those, 34% of participants belong to the PRS group and 66% to the non-PRS group. Inadequate levels of HL were evidenced in 52% and 50% of the participants in the non-PRS and PRS groups, respectively (P = 0.780). No difference in HL levels was found in the noncosmetic versus cosmetic groups (P = 0.783). A statistically significant difference in HL levels was evidenced between nonreconstructive versus reconstructive groups after holding other sociodemographic factors constant (0.29, OR; 95% CI, 0.15-0.58; P < 0.001). Inadequate levels of HL were present in almost half of the cohort, which highlights the importance of adequately assessing HL levels in all patients. It is of utmost importance to evaluate HL in clinical practice using evidence-based criteria to better inform and educate patients interested in plastic surgery.