Abstract
AbstractThe analysis of the volatile fraction of honey provides useful information for the determination of the botanical and geographical origin. However, the results obtained vary greatly upon the extraction procedure employed. Four different isolation techniques were compared, that is hydrodistillation (HD), micro‐simultaneous steam distillation–solvent extraction (MSDE), ultrasound‐assisted extraction (USE) and solid‐phase microextraction (SPME). From the data obtained, USE and SPME seem to be more suitable for the isolation of potent marker compounds. HD and MSDE have main drawbacks because of the drastic conditions used that lead to the formation of artefacts and the degradation of sensitive compounds. These drawbacks are avoided when employing USE and SPME. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
