Abstract
A forming limit diagram (FLD) is commonly used as a useful means for characterising the formability of sheet metal forming processes. In this study, the Nakajima test was used to construct the forming limit curve at necking (FLCN) and fracture (FLCF). The results of the FLCF are compared with incremental sheet forming (ISF) to evaluate the ability of the Nakajima test to describe the fracture in ISF. Tests were carried out to construct the forming limit diagram at necking and fracture to cover the strain states from uniaxial tension to equi-biaxial tension with different stress triaxialities—from 0.33 for uniaxial tension to 0.67 for equi-biaxial tension. Due to the fact that the Gurson–Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) model can be used to capture fracture occurrence at high stress triaxiality, and the shear modified GTN model (Nahshon-Hutchinson’s shear mechanism) was developed to predict the fracture at zero stress or even negative stress triaxiality, the original GTN model and shear modified GTN model may be not suitable to predict the fracture in all samples of the Nakajima test as some samples are deformed under moderate stress triaxiality. In this study, the fractures are compared using the original GTN model, shear modified GTN model and the Nielsen-Tvergaard model with regard to stress triaxiality. To validate the ability of these models, and to assess which model is more accurate in predicting the fracture with different stress triaxialities, finite element (FE) simulations of the Nakajima test were compared with an experimental results to evaluate the applicability of the Nakajima test to characterise the fracture from ISF. The experimental and FE results showed that the shear modified GTN model could predict the fracture accurately with samples under uniaxial tension condition due to low stress triaxiality and that the original GTN model is suitable for an equi-biaxial strain state (high stress triaxiality), whereas the stress triaxiality modified GTN model should be considered for samples which have moderate stress triaxiality (from plain strain to biaxial strain). The numerical and experimental FLCF of pure titanium from the Nakajima test showed a good agreement between the experimental and numerical results of ISF.
Highlights
It is important to predict the fracture and forming limits during the process in sheet metal forming processes
The forming limit diagram (FLD) of SPIF is usually employed to determine the limits of proportional straining before failure and is quite different from the corresponding diagram for traditional sheet forming such as deep drawing or hydroforming
The results showed a good correlation between the experiments and the original GTN model, especially in a biaxial strain state, due to the high stress triaxiality ratio created by this state
Summary
It is important to predict the fracture and forming limits during the process in sheet metal forming processes. The experimental results showed that the distribution of the thickness is uniform in the cross-section of the parts produced by ISF up to the fracture without necking before the fracture. Based on these results, the forming limit curve at necking (FLCN) of traditional sheet metal forming is not suitable for ISF. The forming limit curve at fracture (FLCF) is.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.