Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) and surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of patients with early gastric cancer who received ESD or surgery in Beijing Friendship Hospital from June 2012 to May 2018 were collected. Complete resection rate, complication incidence, hospital stay and expenses between the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference between two groups in complete resection rate[95.7%(245/256) VS 99.0%(97/98), P=0.191], or the complication incidence [5.9%(15/256) VS 8.2%(8/98), P=0.471]. Hospital stay was shorter in the ESD group than that in the surgery group(11.5±3.7 d VS 19.4±13.0 d, P=0.000). Expenses were less in the ESD group than those in the surgery group (27 383.1±10 143.0 yuan VS 78 004.3±79 027.8 yuan, P=0.000). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of ESD are comparable with surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer, but ESD is superior to surgery in hospital stay and expenses. Key words: Surgical procedures, operative; Early gastric cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call