Abstract
Abstract Five electrode systems and procedures that are widely marketed for routine determination of total residual chlorine have been evaluated in a variety of water matrices. The performance, in terms of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity, has been determined for the Orion 97–70 Residual Chlorine Electrode, Chlortect Monitor, Lazar 136A Chlorine Electrode, the forward amperometric titration method, and the back amperometric titration method. Response times for the former too systems were comparable and ranged from 20–100 seconds for chlorine concentrations ranging from 0.3–7 ppm in all water matrices. The Lazar electrode had considerably longer response times. The Chlortect Monitor and the forward amperometric titration method gave the highest sensitivity, with values of + 0.005 and .01 ppm, respectively, at the 1 ppm level. However, the Lazar Electrode could not be completely evaluated because of inconsistencies in the marketed procedures. Each system and method gave a higher precision in chlorine de...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Environmental Science and Health . Part A: Environmental Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.