Abstract

Complexity arises when trying to maximize oil productions from fields using Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESP). The complexity increases with the increase in the number of reservoirs and wells in a particular field. Individual well’s ESP frequencies have to be constantly updated to ensure optimum oil productions from the field. The choice of the ESP frequency to be used must come from sound engineering decisions which do not come from mere intuition but must be backed up by mathematical models and computer simulations. This study proposes to evaluate field production network optimization on ESP lifted wells using quadratic sequential programming techniques. The optimization approach seeks to determine the ESP frequency for each well that will lead to the maximum field oil production while honouring the field operational constraints. Two reservoirs and five wells were considered. The non-linear optimization problem for the ESP lifted wells in the field was formulated with their boundary conditions. The simulations were performed in Prosper and GAP software. Prosper software was used in building the individual well’s ESP models for the five wells in the field. Individual well’s model in Prosper was exported to GAP and simulations were run in GAP for the field network system. GAP simulations were run in two cases: case 1 comprises ESP simulation without optimization while case 2 comprises ESP simulation with optimization. For case 1, fixed values of ESP frequency were selected for each well and the GAP software calculates the production rates from the wells in the network accruing from the ESP frequencies inputted. For case 2, there was no input ESP frequency as the GAP software was allowed to calculate based on optimization algorithms, the best suitable ESP frequencies for each well in the field that will lead to the maximum total oil production in the field network while honouring the operational constraint imposed on the systems in the field. From the results, it was realized that at the basis of well, the higher the ESP frequency, the higher the well’s production rates. Sensitivities on the effects of separator pressure on production rates show that separator pressures affect the well’s productions rates. A reduction in separator pressure from 200 psig to 80 psig led to a 1.69% increase in field oil rate. Comparison of results for case 1 and case 2 showed that ESP field network simulation with optimization yields had a higher field production rate than ESP field network simulations without optimization. There was an increase in oil rate of 1.16% and 2.66% for constraints 1 and 2 when ESP simulation was done with optimization rather than without optimization. Also, simulation with optimization comes with higher pump efficiency than simulation without optimization.

Highlights

  • The production engineer is often faced with the complex and challenging task of ensuring maximum recovery during the exploitation of mature petroleum assets

  • There was an increase in oil rate of 1.16% and 2.66% for constraints 1 and 2 when Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESP) simulation was done with optimization rather than without optimization

  • In simulating for case 1, general Allocation Package (GAP) software was modeled by entering a fix value for the ESP frequency with 60 Hz as base frequency and subsequently sensitivity of 50 Hz and 70 Hz were analyzed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The production engineer is often faced with the complex and challenging task of ensuring maximum recovery during the exploitation of mature petroleum assets. Individual wells are optimized with the intent to achieve maximum oil recovery from the well This is achieved by making changes or adjustments to parameters peculiar to a specific well [4] [5] [6]. For the field-wide optimization, many complexities exist because of the presence of many wells with often varying parameters in the field. These wells mostly exist in the form of clusters. The individual wells may have varying designs, trajectory, depths, and water cuts [7] These may affect the common field facilities shared among the wells such as pump pressure requirement, separator capacity, back pressure coming from shared surface lines, separator position in relation to production manifolds, space availability for

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call