Abstract
The aims of this study were to measure treatment effects of aligner treatments in adult patients directly after treatment and the stability of these effects after ashort-term retention period using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. This double-center trial consecutively screened 98adult patients of whom 33patients were treated according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study sample was shown to be representative for adult orthodontic reality with regard to gender, age, and distribution of malocclusion type. Malocclusion severity was rated by using the PAR Index measured at baseline (T0), after finishing orthodontic treatment with Invisalign® (T1; Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and after amean retention period of 10months (T2). Furthermore, to better understand the observed treatment modality, specific treatment characteristics were recorded and analyzed. The average PAR score at T0 was 22.18 (standard deviation [SD]± 8.68). Posttreatment PAR score was 4.64 (SD ± 4.23) at T1 and was stable after aretention period of 10.07months at T2 (SD ± 126.80days; PAR 4.36, SD ± 3.93). All of the study cases showed asignificant reduction of the total PAR score between T0 and T1 (p < 0.001), but no further difference between T1 and T2 (PAR 4.64 vs. 4.36). Cases were either classified 'improved' (n = 23) or 'greatly improved' (n = 10); no case was classified into the third PAR Index category 'worse or no different'. On average, 72aligners (SD ± 22) with 12attachments per treatment (SD ± 4) were used to align teeth. Six patients needed acase refinement with amean of 23 (SD ± 8) further aligners. The maximum number of needed ClinCheck® (Align Technology Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) treatment plan revisions was 18 (mean 7, SD ± 4). The detected improvement rate indicated agood standard of orthodontic treatment using aligners. Treatment effects were stable throughout ashort-term retention period using aspecific retention protocol. Effectiveness and stability were equally achieved in mild, moderate, and rather severe cases within this consecutive sample. Acritical focus should be placed on accurate treatment planning in order to make tooth movements predictable, realistic, and stable.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
