Abstract

This article presents an evaluation of the QGIS Processing Modeler from the point of view of effective cognition. The QGIS Processing Modeler uses visual programming language for workflow design. The functionalities of the visual component and the visual vocabulary (set of symbols and line connectors) are both important. The form of symbols affects how workflow diagrams may be understood. The article discusses the results of assessing the Processing Modeler’s visual vocabulary in QGIS according to the Physics of Notations theory. The article evaluates visual vocabularies from the older QGIS 2.x and newer 3.x versions. The paper identifies serious design flaws in the Processing Modeler. Applying the Physics of Notations theory resulted in certain practical recommendations, such as changing the fill colour of symbols, increasing the size and variety of inner icons, removing functional icons, and using a straight connector line instead of a curved line. Another recommendation was to provide a supplemental preview window for the entire model in order to improve user navigation in huge models. Objective eye-tracking measurements validated some results of the evaluation using the Physics of Notations. The respondents read workflows to solve different tasks and their gazes were tracked. Evaluation of the eye-tracking metrics revealed the respondents’ reading patterns of the diagram. Evaluation using both Physics of Notation theory and eye-tracking measurements inspired recommendations for improving visual notation. A set of recommendations for users is also given, which can be applied easily in practice using a contemporary visual notation.

Highlights

  • Today, open source GIS software competes with commercial GIS software

  • Open source software QGIS is competitive with commercial GIS software in designing workflow diagrams using Visual programming languages (VPLs)

  • This article presents an assessment of the visual notation of the QGIS Processing Modeler using the Physics of Notations theory in combination with eye-tracking measurement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Open source GIS software competes with commercial GIS software. The user’s choice depends on the price and the degree of functionality in parts of the GIS software. Visual programming languages (VPLs) are used to design steps of processes in the form of workflow diagrams. Open source software QGIS is competitive with commercial GIS software in designing workflow diagrams using VPL. The Processing Modeler is a graphical editor in QGIS software This editor allows workflows to be designed in graphical form using a visual programming language. This article presents an assessment of the visual notation of the QGIS Processing Modeler using the Physics of Notations theory in combination with eye-tracking measurement. The results bring new and innovative ideas that improve the usability of and satisfaction with QGIS software These tasks fall under investigation in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. The improvement is based on theories and both on empirical testing in laboratories [8] e.g., the eye-tracking measurement presented in this article

History of QGIS Processing Modeler
Description of Interface and Graphical Notation
The interface
The difference in brightness is important colour-blind
Theory Physics of Notations
Eye-Tracking Measurement and Experiment
Principle
Suggested orange-brown fill for symbol usedused in the
Principle of Visual
Principle of Graphic Economy
Principle of Dual Coding
Automatic
Principle of Semantic Transparency
Principle of Cognitive Interaction
Evaluation by Eye-Tracking Measurements
16 (Appendix
Results
Evaluation
Symbols forand data and operations
Test of dual codding
Proceeding
Design for Design
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.