Abstract

Our aim was to compare the efficacy of two triggering method one with dual triggering with gonadotropin-realising hormon (GnRH) agonist plus standard dosage human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and the other with hCG only for final oocyte maturation on oocyte/follicle ratio and pregnancy rates in normoresponders in GnRH antagonist cycles in invitro fertilization-intrastoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). In this retrospective study, all patients underwent GnRH antagonist protocol. When at least ≥3 follicles reached ≥17 mm diameter, 116 patients received dual trigger with GnRH agonist plus hCG (1mg Leuprolide acetate plus 10.000 IU uhCG) and 178 patients received uhCG (10.000 IU u hCG) for final oocyte maturation. All follicles ≥10 mm diameter were aspirated. Number of oocytes and metaphase II oocytes retrieved per aspirated follicles, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was recorded. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of metaphase II oocyte ratio per aspirated follicle, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate between the dual trigger group and hCG only group (45.7% vs. 51%; 35.4% vs.30.3% and 45%vs. 40% respectively). Oocyte/ follicle ratio was significantly higher in dual trigger group (68.2%vs 63.8% p=0,028). Dual triggering in normal responders with a GnRH-agonist and a standard dosage of hCG is superior to hCG only protocol in terms of oocyte/follicle ratio but does not improve metaphase II oocyte, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Dual triggering method may be beneficial in patients with immature oocytes and emty follicle syndrome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call