Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of the rotating beam axial shortening modelling. The different methods for accounting for the rotating beam axial shoretning are used to develop four different models. The models are named as the potential energy model (PM), kinetic energy model (KM), and kinetic and potential energy model (KPM), in addition to the model that does not account for the axial shortening named as the consistent model (CM). The PM model accounts for the axial shortening in the form of added elastic potential energy that results from the virtual work done by the centrifugal force. In the KM model, the shortening effect is included in the velocity vector and the corresponding kinetic energy. Finally the KPM model combines both approaches. The results of analysis showed that the approach which handles both the effect of rotating speed and the effect of vibration amplitude for all modes correctly is the PM model. The KM model reflected softening behaviour that cannot be accepted physically by rotating structures for higher modes. Moreover, the combined KPM method showed in-correctness at low amplitudes that contradicts the linear theory.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
