Evaluation of dietary dose administration as an alternative to oral gavage in the rodent uterotrophic and Hershberger assays

Abstract

The rodent uterotrophic and Hershberger assays evaluate potential estrogenic and (anti)-androgenic effects, respectively. Both US EPA and OECD guidelines specify that test substance is administered daily either by subcutaneous injection or oral gavage. However, dietary administration is a relevant exposure route for agrochemical regulatory toxicology studies due to potential human intake via crop residues. In this study, equivalent doses of positive control chemicals administered via dietary and gavage routes of administration were compared in the uterotrophic (17α-ethinyl estradiol) and Hershberger (flutamide, linuron, dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane; 4,4′-DDE) assays in ovariectomized and castrated rats, respectively. For all positive control chemicals tested, statistically significant changes in organ weights and decreases in food consumption were observed by both routes of test substance administration. Decreased body weight gain observed for dietary linuron and 4,4′-DDE indicated that the maximum tolerated dose was exceeded. Hershberger dietary administration resulted in a similar blood exposure (AUC24) for each positive control chemical when compared to gavage. Overall, the correlation in organ weight changes for both the uterotrophic and Hershberger assays suggest that dietary administration is an acceptable route of exposure with similar sensitivity to oral gavage dosing for evaluation of the endocrine potential of a test substance and represents a more appropriate route of test substance administration for most environmental exposure scenarios.