Abstract

<strong>Background:</strong> Digital voice assistants are widely used for health information seeking activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the rapidly changing nature of COVID-19 information, there is a need to evaluate COVID-related information provided by voice assistants, to ensure consumers’ needs are met and prevent misinformation. The objective of this study is to evaluate COVID-related information provided by the voice assistants in terms of relevance, accuracy, comprehensiveness, user-friendliness and reliability. <strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> The voice assistants evaluated were Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Google Assistant, Samsung Bixby, Apple Siri and Microsoft Cortana. Two evaluators posed COVID-19 questions to the voice assistants and evaluated responses based on relevance, accuracy, comprehensiveness, user-friendliness and reliability. Questions were obtained from the World Health Organization, governmental websites, forums and search trends. Data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation, independent samples t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. <strong>Results:</strong> Google Assistant and Siri performed the best across all evaluation parameters with mean scores of 84.0% and 80.6% respectively. Bixby performed the worst among the smartphone-based voice assistants (65.8%). On the other hand, Google Home performed the best among the non-smartphone voice assistants (60.7%), followed by Alexa (43.1%) and Cortana (13.3%). Smartphone-based voice assistants had higher mean scores than voice assistants on other platforms (76.8% versus 39.1%, p = 0.064). Google Assistant consistently scored better than Google Home for all the evaluation parameters. A decreasing score trend from Google Assistant, Siri, Bixby, Google Home, Alexa and Cortana was observed for majority of the evaluation criteria, except for accuracy, comprehensiveness and credibility. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Google Assistant and Apple Siri were able to provide users with relevant, accurate, comprehensive, user-friendly, and reliable information regarding COVID-19. With the rapidly evolving information on this pandemic, users need to be discerning when obtaining COVID-19 information from voice assistants.

Highlights

  • Digital voice assistants are becoming widely used in today’s world

  • A decreasing score trend from Google Assistant, Siri, Bixby, Google Home, Alexa and Cortana was observed for majority of the evaluation criteria, except for accuracy, comprehensiveness and credibility

  • Evaluation of COVID-19 Information Provided by Digital Voice Assistants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Digital voice assistants are becoming widely used in today’s world. In 2020, there were 4.2 billion voice assistants used in various digital platforms worldwide [1], such as smartphones, laptops and smart speakers. Used smartphone voice assistants included Apple Siri (44% in consumer usage), Google Assistant (30%) and Samsung Bixby (4%) [2]. In the study by Kocaballi et al [8], the authors suggested that Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Google Home, Cortana and Bixby were limited in their ability to deal with prompts about mental and physical health, violence and lifestyle. These studies have shown inconsistency in the responses of voice assistants. The objective of this study is to evaluate COVID-related information provided by the voice assistants in terms of relevance, accuracy, comprehensiveness, user-friendliness and reliability

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call