Abstract

Abstract. Recent commercially available laser spectroscopy systems enabled us to continuously and reliably measure the δD and δ18O of atmospheric water vapor. The use of this new technology is becoming popular because of its advantages over the conventional approach based on cold trap collection. These advantages include much higher temporal resolution/continuous monitoring and the ability to make direct measurements of both isotopes in the field. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and precision of the laser based water vapor isotope instrument through a comparison of measurements with those found using the conventional cold trap method. A commercially available water vapor isotope analyzer (WVIA) with the vaporization system of a liquid water standard (Water Vapor Isotope Standard Source, WVISS) from Los Gatos Research (LGR) Inc. was used for this study. We found that the WVIA instrument can provide accurate results if (1) correction is applied for time-dependent isotope drift, (2) normalization to the VSMOW/SLAP scale is implemented, and (3) the water vapor concentration dependence of the isotopic ratio is also corrected. In addition, since the isotopic value of water vapor generated by the WVISS is also dependent on the concentration of water vapor, this effect must be considered to determine the true water vapor concentration effect on the resulting isotope measurement. To test our calibration procedure, continuous water vapor isotope measurements using both a laser instrument and a cold trap system were carried out at the IAEA Isotope Hydrology Laboratory in Vienna from August to December 2011. The calibrated isotopic values measured using the WVIA agree well with those obtained via the cold trap method. The standard deviation of the isotopic difference between both methods is about 1.4‰ for δD and 0.28‰ for δ18O. This precision allowed us to obtain reliable values for d-excess. The day-to-day variation of d-excess measured by WVIA also agrees well with that found using the cold trap method. These results demonstrate that a coupled system, using commercially available WVIA and WVISS instruments can provide continuous and accurate isotope data, with results achieved similar to those obtained using the conventional method, but with drastically improved temporal resolution.

Highlights

  • A commercially available water vapor isotope analyzer (WVIA) with the vaporization system of a liquid water standard (Water Vapor Isotope Standard Source, WVISS) from Los Gatos Research (LGR) Inc. was used for this study

  • We found that the WVIA instrument can provide accurate results if (1) correction is applied for time-dependent isotope drift, (2) normalization to the VSMOW/SLAP scale is implemented, and (3) the water vapor concentration dependence of the isotopic ratio is corrected

  • We found that WVIA instrument can provide accurate results if corrections are applied for: (1) temporal drift, (2) normalization to the VSMOW/SLAP scale, and (3) dependency of isotope results on water vapor concentration

Read more

Summary

Motivation

Global monitoring of oxygen and hydrogen isotope contents in precipitation has been carried out by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in cooperation with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) for more than 40 yr through the IAEA/WMO Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP). Custom-made vaporizer systems, which can provide a frequent supply of water vapor of known isotope content to an in-situ instrument, had to be developed before such an instrument could be deployed in the field (Lee et al, 2005; Iannone et al, 2009; Schmidt et al, 2010; Sturm and Knohl, 2010; Gkinis et al, 2010) This represented a major limitation for the widespread use of this technique. Aemisegger et al (2012) completed an evaluation of this coupled system through comparison with the WS-CRDS, in conjunction with the SDM These studies have highlighted the usefulness of this system to the field monitoring, long-term water vapor isotope monitoring testing across several seasons has not been reported yet. The calibration procedure developed from the laboratory experiment was evaluated through a long-term monitoring program of water vapor isotopes, using both the laser instrument and the conventional cryogenic moisture trapping method

Laser spectroscopy system
Experimental setup for water vapor isotope measurement
Performance test of the WVISS
Accuracy and precision of the WVIA measurement
Ambient air analysis
Long-term stability
Linearity
Concentration dependence
Calibration procedure
Field data evaluation
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call