Abstract
A total of 346 pigs (241 × 600, DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 195.3 lb) were used in a 44-d trial to evaluate the compensatory growth of 200 lb finishing pigs previously fed a low lysine diet. Two diets were manufactured (control and corn diet) and arranged into 4 nutritional strategies. One group of pigs (control) was fed the control diet from d 0 to 44. The other three groups of pigs were fed the corn diet for 2, 3, or 4 weeks and then switched to the control diet until d 44. The control diet contained 13.0% crude protein (CP) and 0.70% standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys. The corn diet contained 8.1% CP and 0.18% SID Lys. There were 9 to 10 pigs per pen and 9 pens per treatment. On average, pigs fed the corn diet grew 49% slower per day than those on the control treatment. The first week after the dietary switch from corn to control diet (recovery period), pigs previously fed the corn diet grew approximately 28% faster than those fed the control treatment, then had approximately 12% greater average daily gain (ADG) than those fed the control treatment for the rest of the recovery period. Despite this compensatory increase in ADG, final body weight (BW) was still lower compared to control pigs, with the exception of the pigs that were only fed the corn diet for 2 weeks and then followed with 4 weeks of recovery on the control diet. Weekly average daily feed intake (ADFI) was similar to the control treatment when pigs were fed the corn diet, but like ADG, was greater during the first week of recovery then returned to similar levels as the control treatment. Weekly feed efficiency (F/G) was worse when pigs were fed the corn diet compared to the control treatment, but improved compared to those on the control treatment during the first week of recovery then returned to a similar level as the control treatment. For the overall period (d 0 to 44), control pigs and pigs fed the corn diet for the first 2 of the 6 weeks had increased (P < 0.05) ADG compared to pigs fed the corn diet for the first 3 or 4 of the 6 weeks. Feed efficiency worsened (P < 0.05) as the length of time that pigs were fed the corn diet increased. Pigs fed the corn diet for the
Highlights
In spring 2020, the US pork industry experienced a substantial reduction in the ability to process market pigs due to plant closures attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic
A total of 346 pigs (241 × 600, DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 195.3 lb) were used in a 44-d trial to evaluate the compensatory growth of 200 lb finishing pigs previously fed a low lysine diet
The first week after the dietary switch from corn to control diet, pigs previously fed the corn diet grew approximately 28% faster than those fed the control treatment, had approximately 12% greater average daily gain (ADG) than those fed the control treatment for the rest of the recovery period
Summary
In spring 2020, the US pork industry experienced a substantial reduction in the ability to process market pigs due to plant closures attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many producers used low lysine, all corn-based diets to reduce ADG of pigs in an attempt to hold pigs for a later marketing time. As processing plants re-opened or increased their processing capability and could accept more pigs, pigs were often switched from the corn-based diets formulated to restrict growth to more standard diets to increase the growth rate of the pigs. The effect of feeding late-finishing pigs Lys-sufficient diets after a period of low-Lys diets is not clear. Our objective was to evaluate the compensatory growth of 200 lb pigs previously fed a Lys-deficient diet, switched to a Lys-sufficient diet over a 6-week period
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
