Abstract
In this study, commercial media and kits for identification and tests for antibiotic susceptibility of genital mycoplasmas were evaluated in comparison to standardized methods. A total of 298 specimens was routinely enrolled. Our results showed that all media corresponded for qualitative and semiquantitative identification with a specificity of 100% for both microorganisms and a sensitivity of 94% for U. urealyticum and of 88% for M. hominis. Standard methods were superior to commercial kits for qualitative and quantitative identification (sensitivity 85-97% for U. urealyticum and 79-83% for M. hominis). There were large discrepancies when testing antibiotic susceptibility.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
