Abstract
The diagnostic criteria issued by the International Headache Society (IHS) (1988) and those of the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) (1969) were evaluated vis-à-vis 163 consecutive cases of cluster headache diagnosed according to the criteria of Ekbom (1970). The agreement between the IHS and Ekbom criteria was very good (96.9%). The difference was explained by five patients who all lacked local autonomous symptoms and signs (conjunctival injection, lacrimation, etc.). At least one of these signs is mandatory according to the IHS and thus the patients escaped a definite diagnosis. Agreement between the WFN and Ekbom criteria was 84.0% (n = 163) and between the WFN and IHS criteria only 76.0% (n = 158).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
