Abstract

As the largest carbon dioxide emitter, China is working towards the direction of a green economy. As an irreplaceable part of establishing a green economy, the low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy is implemented in many large cities in China, and the scope of implementation will be further expanded. However, to date, there has been an absence of empirical studies basing on prefecture-level cities about the evaluation of China’s LCCP policy. Evaluating and optimizing the LCCP policy is constructive to achieve the goal of China’s green economic transition. In this paper, we evaluated the effect of the LCCP policy on China’s low-carbon economic transition by using the difference-in-difference (DID) approach which can effectively alleviate endogenous problems and better evaluate this effect and the panel data of 210 prefecture-level cities in China from 2008 to 2016. The empirical analysis revealed that the LCCP policy inhibited China’s low-carbon economic transition in general. Specifically, the policy worked well in the eastern region but failed in the central region and western region by studying the regional heterogeneity and influence mechanism. The reason is that the LCCP policy can stimulate low-carbon innovation with the help of innovation offset effects in the eastern region, but it failed to do so in the central region and western region. In addition, this paper analyzed the performance of three types of policy tools adopted by local governments to implement the policy, we found that market-economic tools are valuable to improving the low-carbon economic transition in pilot areas, but command-mandatory tools and voluntary tools have failed to achieve the expected objectives. The research results of this article can provide policy recommendations for optimizing the low-carbon policy and provide a reference for countries that are determined to develop a green economy.

Highlights

  • With the process of industrialization, the emission of greenhouse gases has become one of the global challenges [1]

  • To save energy and protect the environment, China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) designated three groups of pilot regions in 2010, 2012, and 2017 to execute a series of measures that target low-carbon transition for the entire city including low-carbon production and low-carbon consumption. These measures implemented in the pilot regions constitute the low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy

  • Under the background of low-carbon development, it is a common challenge for developing countries to achieve the balance between controlling carbon emissions and maintaining economic growth

Read more

Summary

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy: Evidence from 210 prefecture-level cities. OPEN ACCESS Citation: Zhou S, Zhou C (2021) Evaluation of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy: Evidence from 210 prefecture-level cities. As an irreplaceable part of establishing a green economy, the low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy is implemented in many large cities in China, and the scope of implementation will be further expanded. Evaluating and optimizing the LCCP policy is constructive to achieve the goal of China’s green economic transition. We evaluated the effect of the LCCP policy on China’s low-carbon economic transition by using the difference-in-difference (DID) approach which can effectively alleviate endogenous problems and better evaluate this effect and the panel data of 210 prefecture-level cities in China from 2008 to 2016. The research results of this article can provide policy recommendations for optimizing the low-carbon policy and provide a reference for countries that are determined to develop a green economy

Introduction
Policy background and hypothesis
Policy tools and enterprise green technology innovation
Data description
Robustness test
Mediation effect model
Implementation tools analysis
Benchmark regression results
Regional heterogeneity analysis
Regional influence channel analysis
Performance of policy tools analysis
VARIABLES CMT
Author Contributions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call