Abstract

Background Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) measurement on the multicapillary system Capillarys™ is characterized by high throughput and an on-line sample pre-treatment. This study evaluates the linearity and the precision of this technique, the correlation with the candidate reference method and the effect of genetic transferrin variants. Upper reference limit and cut-off values were calculated. Methods The precision study was carried out following CLSI EP5-A protocol. The between laboratory variation was calculated from an eight-site study. The upper reference limit (URL) was conventionally calculated from a reference population of 225 samples and verified by a Bhattacharya analysis in a large (n = 19,129) population. A population of 314 heavy consumers was used for calculation of the cut-off limit. Additionally the measurement uncertainty was calculated according to EDMA (European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association) and IRMM. Results The imprecision found was less than 5%, linearity was excellent for CDT values ranging from 2% to 20%. The between site variation around the cut-off value (CDT ranging from 1.68% to 1.79%) was clinically not significant. The upper reference limit (95th percentile) was calculated at 1.3% by the conventional IFCC method and confirmed by Bhattacharya calculations. The optimum cut-off for this CZE method was 1.6%, taken into account the measurement uncertainty. The regression equation with the candidate reference method was Disialotransferrin(Capillarys2) = Disialotransferrin(HPLC) ∗ 0.968 − 0.248. Genetic variants and abnormal profiles were well recognized. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the Capillarys CDT method is robust and reliable in routine use with a high degree of homogeneity from one system to another and is highly correlated with the candidate HPLC reference method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.