Abstract
Numerical predictions made by a traditional inviscid/boundary-layer method and a parabolized NavierStokes method are compared with wind tunnel data for slender, blunted cones at moderate angle of attack. Mach numbers ranged from 6 to 14 and Reynolds numbers from 0.4 to 16 million. The purpose of the comparison is to evaluate the Mach number and Reynolds number range of applicability of the two prediction methods. Also described are the practical aspects of using these two methods in a design environment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
