Evaluation of bottom-up interventions targeting community-dwelling frail older people in Belgium: methodological challenges and lessons for future comparative effectiveness studies

Anne-Sophie Lambert,Anja Declercq,Jean Macq,Sophie Ces,Thérèse Van Durme,Espoir Bwenge Malembaka

doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4240-9

Anne-Sophie Lambert, Anja Declercq + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4240-9

Copy DOI

Abstract

BackgroundOptimizing the organization of care for community-dwelling frail older people is an important issue in many Western countries. In Belgium, a series of complex, innovative, bottom-up interventions was recently designed and implemented to help frail older people live at home longer. As the effectiveness of these interventions may vary between different population groups according to their long-term care needs, they must be evaluated by comparison with a control group that has similar needs.MethodsThe goal was to identify target groups for these interventions and to establish control groups with similar needs and to explore, per group, the extent to which the utilization of long-term care is matched to needs. We merged two databases: a clinical prospective database and the routine administrative database for healthcare reimbursements. Through Principal Component Analysis followed by Clustering, the intervention group was first stratified into disability profiles. Per profile, comparable control groups for clinical variables were established, based on propensity scores. Using chi-squared tests and logistic regression analysis, long-term care utilization at baseline was then compared per profile and group studied.ResultsStratification highlighted five disability profiles: people with low-level limitations; people with limitations in instrumental activities of daily life and low-level of cognitive impairment; people with functional limitations; people with functional and cognitive impairments; and people with functional, cognitive, and behavioral problems. These profiles made it possible to identify long-term care needs. For instance, at baseline, those who needed more assistance with hygiene tasks also received more personal nursing care (P < 0.05). However, there were some important discrepancies between the need for long-term care and its utilization: while 21% of patients who were totally dependent for hygiene tasks received no personal nursing care, personal nursing care was received by 33% of patients who could perform hygiene tasks.ConclusionsThe disability profiles provide information on long-term care needs but not on the extent to which those needs are met. To assess the effectiveness of interventions, controls at baseline should have similar disability profiles and comparable long-term care utilization. To allow for large comparative effectiveness studies, these dimensions should ideally be available in routine databases.

Highlights

Optimizing the organization of care for community-dwelling frail older people is an important issue in many Western countries
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines disability as “an umbrella term for impairments, activity limitations or participation restrictions” [4]; the last-named refers to difficulties in carrying out essential tasks for independent living and is assessed by the activities of daily life (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily life (IADL) scales [5]
The second disability profile (N = 1932) was the “IADL and low level of cognitive impairment. It consisted of individuals with IADL difficulties, of whom 88% were above the IADL cut-off, with difficulties mainly in preparing meals, performing ordinary housework, managing finances, managing medications, shopping, and transportation

Summary

Introduction

Optimizing the organization of care for community-dwelling frail older people is an important issue in many Western countries. In Belgium, a series of complex, innovative, bottom-up interventions was recently designed and implemented to help frail older people live at home longer. The health status of older people is often characterized by the interplay between frailty, multi-morbidity, and disability. It is worth noting that disability is strongly influenced by cognitive status [6, 7] These three distinct concepts are strong determinants of service needs and utilization, and of home care support [5]. Multi-morbidity is associated with long-term care needs. The level of disability has different repercussions on long-term care needs [10] and determines the necessity to start using home care and to move from home care to a nursing home [11]

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion