Evaluation of bond strength of molar orthodontic tubes subjected to reinforcement with flowable and bonding resins

Abstract

The goal was to evaluate the adhesive shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic tubes bonded to molar teeth and reinforced with Transbond XT (3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA) and flowable resin. In all, 120molar teeth, previously extracted from patients with amean age of30 were included. Orthodontic molar tubes were bonded on the vestibular surface of these teeth with one of two types of adhesive (Transbond XT [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA] or Orthobond [Morelli, Sorocaba, Brazil]). Each of these groups was subsequently divided into four further groups: control and those subjected to the use of resin reinforcement on the occlusal surface of the bonded tubes with one of three materials (Transbond XT, Tetric N Flow [Ivoclar Vivadent, Ellwangen, Germany], Z350 Flow [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA]). SBS and adhesive remnant index tests were performed to evaluate bond strength and type of fracture of the tubes bonded with the different methods. The use of resin reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded with both materials. Flowable composites did not increase the SBS when used as areinforcement. Less than 50% of the adhesive remained on the vestibular surface after the SBS test in most samples of all groups. Transbond XT orthodontic adhesive and Orthobond adhesive had appropriate bonding strengths for clinical use. Furthermore, the use of aresinous reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded. However this technique with flowable adhesives (Tetric N Flow and Z350 Flow) did not significantly increase SBS when orthodontic tubes were bonded with Transbond XT or Orthobond.