Abstract
We tested 41 rotavirus positive and 42 negative specimens as determined by electron microscopy. The assays systems used were an indirect NIH-ELISA, Meritec-Rotavirus, Virogen Rotatest, and Rotazyme II. Meritec and Virogen (latex agglutination assays) were the most sensitive tests, detecting 95% of the positive specimens. The NIH-ELISA detected 81% and Rotazyme detected 63%. Rotazyme was the most specific (100%), followed by the NIH-ELISA (95%) and the two latex agglutination systems (91%). To determine the level of rotavirus detection, we tested three systems against serial two-fold dilutions of ten positive stools. The NIH-ELISA detected rotavirus in an average dilution of 1:723. Rotazyme detected rotavirus in an average stool dilution of 1:366, and Meritec showed an average of 1:164. Rotavirus strains representing serotypes 1-4 were also tested. Meritec was able to detect all four serotypes. Virogen did not react with serotype 2 strains. The NIH-ELISA and rotazyme were unable to detect serotype 3. These data suggest that some latex agglutination assays may be a useful alternative to ELISAs in the clinical laboratory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
