Abstract

The main risk factor for poor graft outcomes is refractory acute rejection and its consequences. In this study, we compared the efficacy of antithymocyte globulins versus other antirejection strategies in reversing refractory acute graft rejection after living donor renal transplant. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 745 patients who received living-donor kidney transplants and experienced acute rejection episodes at Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center in Egypt over the past 20 years. Based on the type of antirejection medication that they received, we divided patients into 2 groups, with 80 patients in the antithymocyte globulin group and 665 patients who had other antirejection strategies. By using event-based sequential graft biopsy histopathology analysis, we compared the efficacy of antithymocyte globulins in reversing refractory rejection in terms of graft and patient complications and survival. Patient survival was comparable in both groups; however, graft survival was better in the antithymocyte globulin group than in the other group; in addition, event-based sequential graft biopsies revealed a lower incidence of acute and chronic rejection episodes after treatment of severe acute rejection in the antithymocyte globulin group compared with the other group. Incidence of posttreatment complications, particularly infection and malignancy, was comparable in both groups. Our retrospective analysis of event-based sequential graft biopsy allowed us to track graft rejection resolution or worsening. Antithymocyte globulins are highly effective in reversing acute graft rejection when compared with other approaches, with no increased risk of infection or malignancy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call