Abstract

Carbonated hydroxyapatite is ideal as a bone graft material because it has similar organic matters to the bone, excellent osteoconductive properties, and good biodegradation in the body. Hydroxyapatite contains the risk of being contaminated by bacteria called Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) in the oral cavity because it has no vascularization, therefore, facilitating adhesion of bacteria, and when applied in the oral cavity, it may cause an infection that then inhibits healing. Thus, it is necessary to use a material that has an antibacterial effect with low potential of causing resistance to treat the postsurgical infection properly. Propolis has antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antitumor, and immunomodulatory activities. Propolis contains a large number of flavonoids and phenols. The phenol compound in propolis is usually called caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), and it has a good antibacterial property. The study aims to evaluate the antibacterial effect of carbonated hydroxyapatite when immersed with different propolis concentrations of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% for 24 h and to measure the zone of inhibition against P. gingivalis. The Kruskal–Wallis test resulted in p = 0.00 (p < 0.05), indicating that there were significant differences among the test groups. The data processing was followed by Mann–Whitney U-test, and the results showed a significant difference in the group of carbonated hydroxyapatite-10 % propolis compared with the other groups. Inhibition zone of carbonated hydroxyapatite that immersed with propolis 10% showed the largest mean of diameters zone of inhibition.

Highlights

  • Guide tissue regeneration (GTR), known as guide bone regeneration (GBR), is a therapy for periodontal tissue regeneration

  • The current study on the antibacterial evaluation of carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) material incorporated with propolis against the growth of P. gingivalis bacteria was divided into five treatment groups: CHA as negative control, CHA-2.5% propolis (CHA + 2.5% propolis), CHA-5% propolis (CHA + 5% propolis), CHA-7.5% propolis (CHA + 7.5% propolis), and CHA-10% propolis (CHA + 10% propolis), in five replicates (Figure 1)

  • The data processing was followed by Mann–Whitney U-test, and the results showed a significant difference in the group of CHA + 10% propolis compared with the other groups

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Guide tissue regeneration (GTR), known as guide bone regeneration (GBR), is a therapy for periodontal tissue regeneration. This material shall be well biocompatible to the body, safe to use, nontoxic, and nonallergic, as well as contains no risk of disease transmission (Ana et al, 2010). The phenol compound in propolis is usually called caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), and this has a good antibacterial property. A study conducted by Scatolini et al, (2018) revealed that hydroxyapatite material incorporated with dried propolis extract showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria. This study incorporated CHA with propolis to see its antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis bacteria

METHODOLOGY
Method Antibacterial Testing
AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call