Abstract
BackgroundWith the growing incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours, there is a need for developing cost-efficient and radiation-free alternatives for spinal interventions. In this paper, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of an image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) system that uses intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging for guidance.MethodsUsing a lumbosacral section of a porcine cadaver, we explored the impact of CT image resolution, ultrasound depth and ultrasound frequency on system accuracy, robustness and effectiveness. Preoperative CT images with an isotropic resolution of , and were acquired. During surgery, vertebrae L1 to L6 were exposed. For each vertebra, five iUS scans were acquired using two depth parameters (5 cm and 7 cm) and two frequencies (6 MHz and 12 MHz). A total of 120 acquisition trials were evaluated. Ultrasound-based registration performance is compared to the standard alignment procedure using intraoperative CT. We report target registration error (TRE) and computation time. In addition, the scans’ trajectories were analyzed to identify vertebral regions that provide the most relevant features for the alignment.ResultsFor all acquisitions, the median TRE ranged from 1.42 mm to 1.58 mm and the overall computation time was 9.04 s ± 1.58 s. Fourteen out of 120 iUS acquisitions (11.66%) yielded a level-to-level mismatch (and these are included in the accuracy measurements reported). No significant effect on accuracy was found with CT resolution (F (2,10) = 1.70, p = 0.232), depth (F (1,5) = 0.22, p= 0.659) nor frequency (F (1,5) = 1.02, p = 0.359). While misalignment increases linearly with the distance from the imaged vertebra, accuracy was satisfactory for directly adjacent levels. A significant relationship was found between iUS scan coverage of laminae and articular processes, and accuracy.ConclusionIntraoperative ultrasound can be used for spine surgery neuronavigation. We demonstrated that the IGNS system yield acceptable accuracy and high efficiency compared to the standard CT-based navigation procedure. The flexibility of the iUS acquisitions can have repercussions on the system performance, which are not fully identified. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between iUS acquisition and alignment performance.
Highlights
Advancing technology and improvement in surgical techniques have contributed to the rising incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours [1, 2]
In our previous work [19], we introduced an open-source and freely available image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) system based on intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging which allows for computed tomography (CT)-to-iUS image alignment for spine instrumentation
No significant effect was found between the accuracy and the CT resolution (F(2,10) = 1.70, p = 0.232)
Summary
Advancing technology and improvement in surgical techniques have contributed to the rising incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours [1, 2]. Neuronavigation performed by IGNS allows the digital tracking of surgical instruments with respect to diagnostic imaging, facilitating tumour localization, anatomy visualization and monitoring surgical progress. There is a non-negligible risk of ionizing radiation exposure to the patient and, perhaps more impotently to the surgical staff, associated with intraoperative CT imaging [12]. Intraoperative MR provides high image resolution and good soft tissue contrast, restrictions due to high costs and ferromagnetic compatibility of surgical instruments limit its application in the OR. With the growing incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours, there is a need for developing cost-efficient and radiation-free alternatives for spinal interventions. We evaluate the capabilities and limitations of an image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) system that uses intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging for guidance
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.