Abstract

Background/ObjectivesAn affordable and scalable screening model is critical for undetected glaucoma. The study evaluated the performance of an offline, smartphone-based AI system for the detection of referable glaucoma against two benchmarks: specialist diagnosis following full glaucoma workup and consensus image grading.Subjects/MethodsThis prospective study (tertiary glaucoma centre, India) included 243 subjects with varying severity of glaucoma and control group without glaucoma. Disc-centred images were captured using a validated smartphone-based fundus camera analysed by the AI system and graded by specialists. Diagnostic ability of the AI in detecting referable Glaucoma (Confirmed glaucoma) and no referable Glaucoma (Suspects and No glaucoma) when compared to a final diagnosis (comprehensive glaucoma workup) and majority grading (image grading) by Glaucoma specialists (pre-defined criteria) were evaluated.ResultsThe AI system demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 93.7% (95% CI: 87.6–96.9%) and 85.6% (95% CI:78.6–90.6%), respectively, in the detection of referable glaucoma when compared against final diagnosis following full glaucoma workup. True negative rate in definite non-glaucoma cases was 94.7% (95% CI: 87.2–97.9%). Amongst the false negatives were 4 early and 3 moderate glaucoma. When the same set of images provided to the AI was also provided to the specialists for image grading, specialists detected 60% (67/111) of true glaucoma cases versus a detection rate of 94% (104/111) by the AI.ConclusionThe AI tool showed robust performance when compared against a stringent benchmark. It had modest over-referral of normal subjects despite being challenged with fundus images alone. The next step involves a population-level assessment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call