Abstract

BackgroundImproper medication reconciliation can result in inaccurate medication lists. When medication lists are inaccurate, it can result in drug-drug interactions, dosing errors, and medication duplication. Interventions targeting medication reconciliation have had varying levels of success. ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe the medication reconciliation educational program, its implementation in a health care system, pharmacist and clinic personnel perception of the program, and its impact on clinic personnel knowledge and practice. MethodsGuided by the Conceptual Model of Implementation Research, a partially mixed sequential dominant status evaluation of a pharmacist-led educational program on evidence-based practices for medication reconciliation implemented into all primary care clinic sites by examining implementation outcomes was conducted. The implementation outcomes measured include penetration, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption. Data were collected through program data and direct observations, pre- and postsurveys, and semistructured interviews of pharmacists and clinic personnel. ResultsOf 46 primary care sites, 37 primary care sites (80%) implemented the pharmacist-delivered medication reconciliation education from April to June 2021 with representation from each of Geisinger’s regions. Ten clinic sites (27%) completed the medication reconciliation educational program as originally designed, with the remainder adapting the program. A total of 296 clinic personnel completed the presurvey, and 178 completed the postsurvey. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between clinic personnel who completed the pre- versus postsurvey. All clinic personnel interviewed felt satisfied with the educational program and felt it was appropriate because it directly affected their job. Clinic personnel felt the educational program was acceptable and appropriate; two major concerns were discussed: a lack of patient knowledge about their medications and a lack of time to complete the medication reconciliation. The adherence rate to the elements of the medication reconciliation that were covered in the education program ranged from 0% to 95% in the 55 observations conducted. ConclusionAn educational program for medication reconciliation was found to be acceptable and appropriate but was often adapted to fit site-specific needs. Additional barriers affected adoption of best practices and should be addressed in future studies.

Highlights

  • Improper medication reconciliation can result in inaccurate medication lists

  • This study aimed to describe the medication reconciliation educational program, its implementation in a health care system, pharmacist and clinic personnel perception of the program, and its impact on clinic personnel knowledge and practice

  • The educational program highlighted several practices that are consistent with a comprehensive medication reconciliation as follows: (1) use open-ended questions, (2) clarify and determine pharmacy used by the patient, (3) ask the patient about their current medications, (4) have the patient state the medication, strength, dose, and how they take each medication, (5) ask for clarification if their response differs from the list in the electronic health record, (6) ask about nonprescription medications the patient is taking, and (7) evaluate medication adherence.[10,11,12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Improper medication reconciliation can result in inaccurate medication lists. When medication lists are inaccurate, it can result in drug-drug interactions, dosing errors, and medication duplication. Objective: This study aimed to describe the medication reconciliation educational program, its implementation in a health care system, pharmacist and clinic personnel perception of the program, and its impact on clinic personnel knowledge and practice. Methods: Guided by the Conceptual Model of Implementation Research, a partially mixed sequential dominant status evaluation of a pharmacist-led educational program on evidencebased practices for medication reconciliation implemented into all primary care clinic sites by examining implementation outcomes was conducted. Data were collected through program data and direct observations, pre- and postsurveys, and semistructured interviews of pharmacists and clinic personnel. Clinic personnel felt the educational program was acceptable and appropriate; two major concerns were discussed: a lack of patient knowledge about their medications and a lack of time to complete the medication reconciliation. Conclusion: An educational program for medication reconciliation was found to be acceptable and appropriate but was often adapted to fit site-specific needs. Jones et al / Journal of the American Pharmacists Association xxx (2022) 1e10

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call