Evaluation of an E–ε and Three Other Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes in the WRF Model over the Southeast Pacific and the Southern Great Plains

Abstract

Abstract To accurately simulate the atmospheric state within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) by PBL parameterization scheme in different regions with their dominant weather/climate regimes is important for global/regional atmospheric models. In this study, we introduce the turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) and TKE dissipation rate (ε) based 1.5-order closure PBL parameterization (E–ε, EEPS) in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The performances of the newly implemented EEPS scheme and the existing Yonsei University (YSU) scheme, the University of Washington (UW) scheme, and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino (MYNN) scheme are evaluated over the stratocumulus dominated southeast Pacific (SEP) and over the Southern Great Plains (SGP) where strong PBL diurnal variation is common. The simulations by these PBL parameterizations are compared with various observations from two field campaigns: the Variability of American Monsoon Systems Project (VAMOS) Ocean–Cloud–Atmosphere–Land Study (VOCALS) in 2008 over the SEP and the Land–Atmosphere Feedback Experiment (LAFE) in 2017 over the SGP. Results show that the EEPS and YSU schemes perform comparably over both regions, while the MYNN scheme performs differently in many aspects, especially over the SEP. The EEPS (MYNN) scheme slightly (significantly) underestimates liquid water path over the SEP. Compared with observations, the UW scheme produces the best PBL height over the SEP. The MYNN produces too high PBL height over the western part of the SEP while both the YSU and EEPS schemes produce too low PBL and cloud-top heights. The differences among the PBL schemes in simulating the PBL features over the SGP are relatively small.